About Me

My photo
"Believer, fighter and animal lover" Hi Guys, my name is Anna Janiszewska and I am 3rd year student of Public Relations and Communication. I never before written the blog but I hope you will enjoy what I have to say about diffident aspects of our word. This blog should question what is right and what is wrong, in shorter explanation -ethical. Please enjoy

Saturday 8 January 2011

Food labelling.





During the shopping do  you concerning  what  kind of food you are looking for or whatever this food will be healthy?  If  not don't worry  because the guys from FSA (Food Standard Agency) will definitely try give you all options of labels that you can chose from what is right for you

I love them for that, you know guys how it is to be on the diet...is so hard, you stress and the worst part of the diet is to do a shopping! I have definitely sweat tooth and I love crisps then for me the shopping was like a hell, but since I discover food labelling is just fun. I don't know how you guys feel about FSA and they great idea but they gave me so big satisfaction of making the right choices.                                                    
But....
Do you think food labelling could lead some of the companies/products to losing their customers?

For example, you go to the store with the intention of buying a package of crisps. Do you change your mind if you see that on one label of the parcels is less fat than the other package? I think your answer is yes. Now the question arises whether our knowledge is sufficient in order to make decisions which product is better than another?



Only because one of the parcels was less fat than the other is not marked the first package healthier, maybe because the salt level was so high that it will be better for our bodies to have some more fat then more salt.


Please tell me what you think about that. 

Sunday 12 December 2010

Crime in Katyn


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DS_trmkeBYc&feature=fvst

Yevgeny Dżugaszwili, grandson of Joseph Stalin, sued State Duma, lower house of parliament in Russia in the recent resolution which condemned the massacre of Polish officers in the spring of 1940 "Katyn" year as a crime of the Stalinist regime.
According to Communist Party of the Russian Federation (KPRF)Dżugaszwil suit against the Russian Federation State Duma last Friday ,  demanded recognition as "incompatible with reality" and "defamatory honor and dignity" of his grandfather observation that the Katyn massacre had been made Stalin's direct order.


Grandson of the tyrant's demands also on the lower house of parliament Russia's cancellation of this document and he wants them to pay him 100 million rubles (3.25 million dollars) as compensation.



In my opinion he should be sued by Polish government. I am so glad that after 50 years they admitted to this massacre, and I am just wondering if you guys knew about Katyn before? If not please watch the link which I uploaded in the beginning of this post.


Have a nice evening. 


Friday 10 December 2010

Liu Xiaobo has not received a Nobel Peace Prize.



In Oslo just an empty chair with his photography. - He did not do anything wrong and he must be free - called at the ceremony  Prime Minister Norway Thorbjorn Jagland.
In Beijing during the ceremony transmission on CNN and the BBC were interrupted . For the fifth time in the history of the Nobel ceremony the winner was absent in this case - Chinese dissident Liu Xiaobo. 54-year-old Liu was awarded in 2009, sentenced to 11 years in prison for subversive activities, including the drafting of the manifesto, which called for democratic reforms in China.Liu were jailed because he believed that he can use the  human rights, by his straggle he become a symbol for freedom in China. 


I know that China has big economic achievements, but I think they must  simultaneously develop human rights. I think they need more brave people like Liu. 




Sunday 5 December 2010

CIPR PRide Award -"My dog’s a blood donor"




As part of my university assignment I was required to choose a campaign from a 2009 or recent winner of the CIPR’s PRide Award.  I was expected to give an eight minute poster session about the case study campaign, its objectives, the strategy adopted, the actions taken and the outcomes achieved. As evaluation of the campaign I decided to choose SWAT analysis to identify specifically the elements of the campaign which demonstrate best practice.

 As soon as I looked at the list of winners from 2009, Mistral Group who worked with Pet Blood Bank UK the charity really stood out to me.




                          
Background:

 Pet Blood Bank UK is a non for profit charity specialised in collecting, processing and supporting pet blood products. The ability to carry out blood transfusions is often essential for vets when they are fighting to save the life of a family pet. Like humans, dogs benefit from transfusions during surgery and to treat major trauma and disease.  In January 2009, Mistral was asked to embark on a national PR campaign to raise awareness of this unique service among vets, vet nurses and pet owners. Included in the campaign were two key diary dates for the charity—its second birthday celebrations and the launch of the first ever mobile canine blood collection unit. 


                 
Objectives:
 Increase awareness of transfusion medicine amongst veterinary professionals
 Engage pet owners with the concept of blood donating
 Support activities to raise awareness of PBBuk’s work across all target audiences
(Vets, pet owners, general consumer)



                       

Strategy:
 Make people aware of PBBuk and the work it carries out
 Provide a call to action to get vets and pet owners to do something
 Underpin all activity with the educational key messages


Key campaign elements:
PBBuk second birthday celebrations
In March 2009, PBBuk celebrated its second birthday. In its first two years, the charity had successfully signed up 1,200 dogs to the register. But, with 7.4 million dogs in Britain, more donors were needed; therefore part of the birthday celebration strategy was to encourage more dog owners to sign up their pets to the cause.
It was vital that new recruits were found to assist with this life-saving service for dogs. Following an extensive media sell-in, the children’s TV show Newsround agreed to film a session with its young reporters. This provided prime-time TV coverage for the charity. It was backed by comprehensive online and print   coverage.
Launch of UK’s first mobile canine blood collection unit:
In May 2009, PBBuk joined forces with Royal Canin to launch the UK’s first mobile blood collection unit at Nottingham University. This activity presented Mistral with a unique opportunity to target the nation’s press with a good news story and one which would spark media interest and attention. 
As part of the planning process, Mistral worked with PBBuk, Royal Canin and Nottingham University to produce relevant press materials – a launch release for veterinary press, pet press and nationals; a photocall notice for regional and national media; a national broadcast notice; and posters for veterinary practice waiting rooms. On the day, we organised a photographer, arranged media interviews and followed up the press. Coverage was far reaching including South Africa and USA!
Veterinary education:
A key part of the campaign is the education of vets and vet nurses about the different aspects of pet blood transfusions. In particular, we needed to educate them about the importance of blood typing an animal before it is given a transfusion.  
Activity included press visits to the blood processing laboratory, bespoke features were written on
1) Blood transfusion medicine—searching for the perfect blood donor
2) Developing practice protocols for blood transfusions and
3) The importance of blood typing.
 In addition, we launched the planned extension to the service – a feline blood collection service.

Pet owner education:
The concept of pet blood donors is still new to owners and Mistral needed to employ some real-life news stories to not only show owners how blood transfusions have saved a pet’s life, but also how their pet could help save the lives of many others with just one donation.
Case studies and educational features have been placed in pet press and online to maximise awareness and interest. 

Results:

The campaign has sparked interest among the defined target audiences about the 
concept of pet blood donors. The national launch activity reached audiences, young 
and old, through a variety of print and broadcast media. 
For the period from January-June 2009, Mistral secured 117 pieces of known 
coverage (print and broadcast). This equated to 18,304,324 million opportunities to 
see / hear. The 10 key messages for the campaign, identified at the outset, were 
delivered through the media relations activity (see attached key message sheet). In 
just under half the coverage, more than three key messages were mentioned in each 
piece, with 14 pieces including over six. The average key message delivery was two 
per piece.

On my poster session I prepared hand draft chart to show the results in numbers. I compared how many dogs were registered before campaign and after. As brief said before the campaign (2 years) charity successfully signed 1200 dogs as a donors.  The campaign brought 800 more dogs in only 9 months that gives as the result of 35% more then years before. 



 My last slide was about SWOT analysis. 
In my opinion the strengths of the campaign was definitely key messages because they were showing how well PR company done they research.  They target all potential audiences. 
Weaknesses:
In my opinion Mistral should push more use of social media. They could create own facebook page. On this page they could keep uploading home made videos from laboratorium to show to people how blood transfusion lookalike. 
Opportunities:
Definitely the benefits which charity could use in the future. The media coverage was really positive that's why they can organisate in the future similar events like 3rd birthday celebration.    
Threats:
I believe the threats for this campaign could've be bad press. IF for example on the actual lunch celebration of the blood collection unit the journalist will spot bad threats for animals by the personal staff or dog injury during the blood transfusion  that could lead campaign to fail. 

I honestly think that campaign deserve gold award. The objectives meet results with 100 %. They were able to target all audiences and they spread successfully awareness of this unique service that charity provides.  The charity after the campaign can grove bigger and start helping other animals like cats. 

My question is guys;
1) Do this campaign deserve gold award?
2) If you have a dog would you register him as a donor after hearing about this campaign?
3) If you could change something as different key messages what that will be?

Monday 15 November 2010

2 year old is smoking 40 cigarette a day!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x4c_wI6kQyE&feature=related

Hi guys I would like to share this video with you. This is just mind blowing. I would like to know what was your first reaction while watching the video.

Good night.

Tuesday 9 November 2010

It is ethical to kill?

Hi guys, today I would like to talk about really soft subject which is abortion.
Few day ago me and others course student were asked to Felicitate a discussion. Our main topic was titled “It is ethical to kill?” We split between us subjects relevant to the main topic. Jenna was doing police force; Sam was doing euthanasia; me-abortion and Kristina- killing disabled kids by their parents.

In the beginning of my discussion I presented to the group of 9 people what abortion is and I gave some facts as:
  • ·         Legal in the UK up to 24 weeks
  • ·         Religion point of view-comparing Church of England and Roman Catholic Church  
  • ·         512 abortions carry out every day
  • ·         6 million abortions since 1967
  • ·         statistics  

Personally I believe that abortion is right, but when I was sitting in class and when ALL students raise their hand upon the question “it is ethical to do abortion”, I got scared...
I will never decide to do abortion because I am now in perfect relationship, but I believe in freedom. I am just concern why so many people using abortion as the contraception?
From the statistics 32% of women are having had one or more prior’s abortions!!!!!!

AND THAT IS NOT ETHICAL!

I am originally from Poland and abortion in my country in illegal. They are some exemptions:  

  • ·         rape
  • ·         underage
  • ·         problems during  pregnancy
It is SOOOOO hard to decide what is right because word “right” for some people is different than for the others.   

Personally I know what is ethical to me but I don’t know if this same case for someone else is similar.  

The abortion subject was really emotional for me, and my tutor Dr. Catherina Sweet remind me that I got to personal, and because I was just felicitating I shouldn’t show my feelings towards a subject but  I didn’t like the view of some many people accepting that it is right after all those nasty facts what I presented. 
Personally I will change the weeks limit from 24 to max 12. I am not able to understand why someone chose the limit of 24 weeks!!!!
Do you know that in 24 week- 
Baby is almost completely formed, and is beginning to deposit brown fat on his or her body. The purpose of the brown fat is to retain body heat. Newborns are bad at regulating body temperature at first. Babies born at this point have some chances of survival with very special care.


I think this is discussing! This is a human being, the baby without any chance to defend!

Guys could you please answer fallowing questions?


·   What do you think about abortion?
·   Do you think interpretation of religion and science contradicts each other on abortion?
·   Do you think legalization of abortion have helped reducing death and health complications due to illegal abortion?
·   In which case you think abortion should not be legalised?
·   What is your opinion on the NHS providing abortion services?

Monday 1 November 2010

Fairness doesn't exist in our world

Personally I doesn't believe in fairness, people are good and bad staff always keep happen to them. By my own experience- from beginning of my life to when I turned 9 years old I was perfectly happy child, that finish when my Mom divorce my dad and started new relationship with my stepfather. My stepfather was like from those horrible movie- sweet on the outside and sour in the inside. From all this years I was asking question Why this happen to me? I never done anything wrong to other people, never done drugs, I was always good child coming back home after the school and that child who have to grow up so quickly that I forgot what word childhood means.
Fairness?
Now I would like to talk about the "fairness" in political world. Few weeks ago as you may remember we had in England important Wednesday. Government is trying to "riper" England by cutting the budget.